GeneralistOperatorPeer public scoresmeth_v0_1_1as of 2026-07-11

GPT-5.6 Sol · API · Max effort

The ecosystem operator — max-effort Sol for hard agents, not cheap chat.

OpenAI flagship Build for autonomous coding and professional workflows when ecosystem tools and max reasoning justify $5/$30.

SharePost on X

Codex rating

79.7

Confidence B

Overall mean of attribute public scores after peer min-max (40–95 band within scored launch peer set).

Loadout

Endpoint: gpt-5.6-sol
Product: OpenAI API
Price: $5 / $30 per MTok
Context: 1000k tokens

OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol API at max reasoning effort, 1M context, $5/$30 per MTok. Frontier generalist / coding-agent rival to Claude Opus for hard long-horizon work.

Core attributes

Six stats · peer public

Peer publicbars = rank in scored peer set (≈40–95) · raw = absolute fusion under the bar

STRExecution

94.9raw 87.9A90.9–98.9

DEXTempo

58.3raw 58.0B48.3–68.3

CONReliability

95.2raw 87.5A91.2–99.2

INTReasoning

94.9raw 88.5A90.9–98.9

WISJudgment

39.9raw 55.8A35.9–43.9

CHACollaboration

95.0raw 91.0B85–100

Peer public (main number / bar) ranks this Build inside the current scored peer set (≈40–95). Raw is the absolute evidence-fusion aggregate before min-max. A low peer score can still be a strong absolute model — see methodology.

Practical verdict

When to choose

Best at

Long-horizon coding agents (named harnesses)
Terminal / DevOps-style multi-step work
Mixed professional workflows with strong tool use

Avoid for

Latency-first everyday chat (use lower effort or Luna/Terra)
Strict budget token farms
Trust-critical judgment without verification (high Omniscience hall pattern)

Choose this when

You want OpenAI tooling + max-effort frontier performance on hard multi-step jobs.

Skills

Task proficiencies

Test Writing96.2 A

Creative Writing91.0 B

Professional Writing91.0 B

Refactoring90.0 A

Debugging88.8 A

Devops And Terminal88.0 A

Tool Calling88.0 A

Existing Codebase Work87.0 A

Long Autonomous Runs84.0 A

Quantitative Reasoning79.7 A

Research Synthesis73.4 A

Following Complex Instructions69.1 B

Fast Interactive Work58.0 B

Traits & Quirks

Signature strengths and honest flaws

No structured traits or flaws catalogued for this Build yet. Traits are behavioural patterns (beyond raw scores) — added as evidence and field observation accumulate. See Best at / Avoid for above in the meantime.

Evidence Terminal

Traceability

Every factual claim cites an evidence row. Tap a chip to see the benchmark, exact config, source, and caveats behind the number.

GPQA Diamond94.1%A Humanity's Last Exam47.2%A AA-Omniscience59B Artificial Analysis API latency / throughput74.5B Chatbot Arena / LMArena human preference1509B SWE-bench Pro64.6%B SWE-bench Verified96.2%A Terminal-Bench88%A

Engine pass meth_v0_1_1 (peer min-max vs scored launch peer set). Codex overall 79.7 (B). Attribute public scores map raw aggregates into a 40–95 band within the peer set (methodology min-max). INT uses hierarchical fusion (GPQA primary / HLE secondary / capped bleed).