Opus vs Sonnet
Flagship ceiling vs daily driver inside Anthropic — when upgrading is worth it. Public stats are peer-relative ranks (40–95 band among scored Builds), not absolute “% intelligence.”
Claude Opus 4.8 · API · High effort (default)
The expensive architect — pays for hard repos, long agents, and fewer retries.
Claude Sonnet 5 · API · High effort (default)
A polished code smith with expensive habits — still the sensible daily driver.
Six attributes (peer public)
Same-harness & loadout
| Signal | Opus | Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| Vals SWE Verified · mini-swe-agent | 88.6% | 79.6% |
| Arena Elo (Thinking) | 1506 | 1485 |
| List price (in/out) | $5 / $25 | $2–3 / $10–15 |
Large Existing Codebase
Decisive on Execution: Opus — public ranges do not overlap (Opus 73.5–81.5 vs Sonnet 36–44).
- Large Existing CodebaseOpus · conf A
Clear independent SWE gap; peer STR also favors Opus over Sonnet.
Quest Fit → - Vibe Code a New AppSonnet · conf B
Quality close enough; price and tempo favor the daily driver.
Quest Fit → - Fast EverydaySonnet · conf A
DEX + cost inside the Claude family.
Quest Fit → - Under BudgetSonnet · conf A
Hard price filter vs Opus.
Quest Fit →
Opus: Pays for hard repos, long agents, and verification when wrong is expensive.
Sonnet: Default professional coding partner — elite enough most days without flagship burn.